Roger wrote:
> No. You don't want to drain either split pack below 50% either Right, and you wouldn't get anywhere near that. > the energy storage required of the single pack does not have to be > greater than that of the pair of split packs (in fact, if you do the > math involving Peukert effects, the single pack can be a bit smaller > than the pair of split packs), so there is no extra weight to be a > problem. Yeah, Jon already mentioned, but as I said, I was assuming a smaller pack for the downhill leg. Hey, I've never even seen anyone using two separate packs, I was merely trying to configure an arrangement that would overcome the problem of the return leg being uphill with a partially drained pack, without adding so many additional batteries that weight is then the problem. Vince
