On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:29 AM, EVDL Administrator via EV <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm no expert, but I suppose it might come to pass if PV efficiency jumps 
> and cost tumbles,

PV efficiency is already plenty. The insolation on the average single-family 
home's roof at today's efficiency is virtually always some multiple, generally 
some very significant multiple, of the home's electricity use. And said 
multiple is again virtually always more than adequate to charge a vehicle.

And materials are and for some time have been the cheapest component of a PV 
installation. What costs all the money is first and foremost the labor; 
qualified electricians aren't cheap, especially those who both have experience 
with high voltage DC and are competent roofers. And, many places, the legal 
paperwork -- all the permits and inspections and utility company writeoffs and 
what-not -- winds up costing more than the bill of materials.

The key ingredients we really need are twofold: solar roofing installations 
that can take the place of and be installed by today's low-skill roofing 
laborers (perhaps with an electrician just for the final run from the roof to 
the breaker box) and less-expensive battery technology. The former exists in 
various prototypes that keep getting mentioned in press releases, and the 
latter is something well known to the EV crowd.

> "Aargh, no clean underwear, and I can't do laundry because we're at 7% and I 
> still have to charge the car.  I wonder if the car has enough charge left 
> for a trip to the store to buy some."

That just means the system is under-sized. In such a case, either you should 
have spent more for a bigger system, or you knew what you were getting into and 
therefore budget your energy use accordingly. Low income households already 
face similar problems...do I pay the electric bill with the last $50 remaining 
on this credit card's limit, or do I use the money to buy groceries for the 
kids?

> "Sorry, boss, I can't come in to work until this afternoon.  Joe ran the 
> house flat with his welder last night, and I won't have enough juice to 
> charge my car until the sun comes up."

If Joe's a contractor, he should be showing up with his own power supply (such 
as one of the many industrial EVs we've seen Bruce mention with their own power 
plugs) to run the welder in this future -- or, otherwise, first making sure 
that the site he's visiting has the spare capacity to power the welder. And if 
Joe lives in the home, it's his own damned fault.

> Also, the cost of storage (lithium battery? what?) 

It's a big question today, but I suspect we'll have a clear winner in the next 
several years at the most. Nickel-iron batteries live longer than people but 
cost more than any other type of battery. Lead acids are pretty cheap but die 
after a few years and cost significantly more over a lifetime. But there may 
well be a market in EV batteries old enough to be less than optimal for 
vehicular use but still with plenty left in them for an off-grid system. I 
could see leasing / renting of battery systems becoming popular, with the 
company that owns the batteries responsible for ensuring a minimum kWh capacity 
of the pack in exchange for whatever fees they charge, similar to what we've 
speculated Tesla might offer with their car battery swaps.

> would have to decline by, oh, I dunno, say, 90%?

Nowhere near as much.

In many parts of the country, the payback time for a complete off-grid solution 
is better than the payback time for money market funds and other financial 
instruments. That is, if you're invested in the stock market or especially your 
bank, you'll be wealthier at the end of a decade or three if you pull the money 
out and put it into an off-grid system.

But that requires a significant amount (to most people) of available capital.

But it also means that a business -- such as Solar City -- can afford to invest 
its own capital (or borrowed funds) to install such a system and become an 
ad-hoc utility and still make a marginal profit.

That's with today's technology...and it's only getting better.

> I have no idea whether such a quantum leap in PV and energy storage tech is 
> on the horizon. Absent one, though, I suspect your estimate of "ten to 
> twenty years" is probably a bit optimistic.

But that's just it. It's doable _and_economical_ today, if you have the capital 
to invest. No more revolutionary breakthroughs are required to bring it to the 
masses; only gradual refinements of the types we regularly see and expect, 
perhaps coupled with some entrepreneurial innovation.

Cheers,

b&
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150109/52f1e68d/attachment.pgp>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to