For what it is worth, I researched the improvements in battery
capacity since the Edison  Nickel-iron EV battery in the 1900's.
Looks like it went from 20 Whr/kg to 400 Whr/kg on the latest Tesla
cells.  A 20-to-1 improvement.

For solar, I use the factor of about 200-to-one since 1970.
Bob,

On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 5:22 PM EVDL Administrator via EV
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 8 May 2021 at 10:10, (-Phil-) via EV wrote:
>
> > Biofuels can at least be carbon neutral, as you can close the
> > carbon cycle.  It will take a long way to get there of course, as the
> > complete biofuel production cycle is also still a carbon intensive
> > operation, but this can be fixed over time.
>
> With all due respect, "this can be fixed over time" is a bit too much hand-
> waving for my taste.
>
> The problem with biofuels is that growing and harvesting crops, processing
> them, and transporting the fuel to the use point requires substantial energy
> input, and most of it comes from carbon based fuels.  Even fertilizer and
> pesticides are made from petroleum.  I just don't see that equation changing
> fast enough to get us to carbon-neutral in time.
>
> The only biofuel application I can think of that *might* get closer sooner -
> and I'm not 100% sure about even this - is electricity generation.  For
> example, Uruguay's power system runs largely on pulverized Eucalyptus wood.
> The problem with this is that petroleum giants have governments bought and
> paid for, and they can't make money from distributing wood chips as easily
> as they can from corn processed into ethanol.
>
> There's also the fact that food turned into fuel while people are starving
> round the world has some ... ethical considerations.
>
> > To get to electrification quicker, I still think some hybridization is
> > good.
>
> Your point about improving utilization of limited battery-production
> capacity is a good one.  We need to keep plugging ahead (sorry) with battery
> recycling, and with developing batteries that use less exotic materials.
> NiMH, anyone?  Hello?
>
> But at the consumer level, I think that the use case for hybrids - I mean
> real ones, not "you naver have to plug it in" pseudo-hybrids - is fading as
> true BEV battery capacity grows and rapid charging facilities multiply.
>
> It's also easier and more efficient to add PV capacity to EV charging than
> it is to add "renewability" to ICEV refueling.
>
> Finally, a BEV is mechanically much simpler and at least theoretically more
> reliable than an ICEV, let alone a hybrid with the complexity of both.  I
> haven't run the numbers, but intuitively, manufacturing a BEV has to be less
> carbon intensive than manufacturing a hybrid, and it should have a longer
> service life.
>
> Like LPs and phono cartridges in 1980, today's ICEVs are highly complex,
> almost impossibly refined machines only made affordable by serial production
> and massive amounts of long-term development.
>
> Like CD players in the late 1980s and early 1990s, EVs are evolving rapidly
> and quickly declining in cost, thanks to economy of scale and research into
> battery optimization.
>
> Perhaps I'm being uncharacteristically overoptimistic, and I could certainly
> be wrong, but I think that what CDs did to LPs by 1995 is what EVs are
> poised to do to ICEVs now - if politicians will let them.  True hybrids may
> still have a place, but I think (and hope) not for much longer.
>
> David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey
>
> To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my
> offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>      That's not a "cloud,"  It's just someone else's computer.
>
>                                         -- Anonymous
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to [email protected]
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to