There are some regulatory drivers here, not just company image or ESG.

Companies will need to buy zero emission trucks.

- Mark

Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone

> On Aug 15, 2021, at 11:11 AM, Peri Hartman via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This will be interesting to watch. They want a half billion dollars to scale 
> up, which actually sounds kind of small for the kind of manufacturing they 
> are planning. I think Tesla invested a lot more than that to start its 
> Gigafactories and other facilities. Even so, will they be able to generate 
> enough revenue to pay debt service and keep investors happy. And, the payback 
> for customers is questionable. While corporations might be willing to pay 
> more up front for putting on a greener image, it will need to pay off in the 
> long run. Theoretically it seems it should - all the arguments for EVs should 
> more or less apply: little fuel used while idling, far less drive train 
> maintenance, presumably lower fuel costs.
> 
> Peri
> 
> << Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "paul dove via EV" <[email protected]>
> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "paul dove" <[email protected]>; "EVDL Administrator" <[email protected]>
> Sent: 15-Aug-21 05:43:24
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] hydrogen isn't green, after all
> 
>> Hyzon Motors has begun shipping hydrogen fuel cell trucks to customers – 
>> TechCrunch
>> https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2021/08/11/hyzon-motors-has-begun-shipping-hydrogen-fuel-cell-trucks-to-customers/amp/
>> Interesting startup
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>> 
>> 
>> On Sunday, August 15, 2021, 2:58 AM, EVDL Administrator via EV 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm not an expert, just a longtime EV follower, but I think that when it
>> comes to road vehicles, hydrogen had its chance and missed it.
>> 
>> In 2001, the limitation on EVs was, and always had been, the battery.  In
>> 1999, the GM EV1 had had a 26kWh NiMH battery, and the Nissan Altra EV had
>> had a 32 kWh lithium ion battery - more than respectable for the time.  But
>> NiMH was artificially locked out of real world EVs, and both types were
>> hideously expensive.  For all intents and purposes, in 2001 EV batteries
>> were still lead. A typical conversion carried maybe 12kWh of usable
>> capacity.
>> 
>> Who here would have guessed then that 20 years hence we'd have production
>> EVs at all, much less production EVs with batteries in the 50-100kWh
>> capacity range?  Who would have thought that 150kW public charging would
>> start to appear on main highways, potentially charging a 50kWh battery in 20
>> minutes?
>> 
>> In 2001, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and Hyundai all had concept and/or
>> demonstration FCEVs running.  The feeble BEV range of the time opened a
>> window of opportunity for them.
>> 
>> Honda was the first to US market (California lease only) with the FCX
>> Clarity in 2008.  Between 2008 and 2015, they leased all of 48.  (They now
>> have another on offer, but again only in California, for reasons that will
>> become clear in a moment.)
>> 
>> After what they did with getting the Prius to market, you'd think that if
>> anyone could make FCEVs a success, it would be Toyota.
>> 
>> Toyota put the Mirai FCEV on US offer in 2015 (exactly 6 years ago to the
>> day, in fact).  It had a fairly impressive per-fillup range of 312 miles.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, that hydrogen fillup cost about $85.  And since hydrogen was
>> nigh onto unavailable anywhere but in California (even today only 17 other
>> states have *any* H2 stations), that was the only state where you could buy
>> one -  or drive one.
>> 
>> That same year, 2015, you could buy a Tesla Model S 85D with 260+ miles of
>> range and fill it up at any supercharger in any state.  The S cost more than
>> the Mirai did, but the cost of "free" supercharger use for as long as you
>> owned it was still built into the price of the car.
>> 
>> 2016 Sales
>> 
>> Toyota Mirai: 1,034
>> Tesla Model S: 29,421
>> 
>> Now why do you suppose Tesla sold over 28 times as many in 2016?
>> 
>> I have serious reservations about any automaker developing its own fueling
>> infrastructure, but the fact is that Tesla built superchargers by the dozens
>> and hundreds.  How many hydrogen filling stations did Toyota build?
>> 
>> EVs are a HUGE change in vehicle culture.  Public charging for them is a
>> HUGE investment in infrastructure.
>> 
>> The reality of capitalism is that it resists such changes with all its
>> might.  Thus it's almost a miracle that we've seen BEVs become more or less
>> mainstream, at least in Europe.
>> 
>> A change like that doesn't come along often.  TWO of each - BEVs and FCEVs,
>> charging service and hydrogen fuel service - just aren't bloody likely to
>> develop in one generation, let alone in a decade or two.
>> 
>> BEV public charging is growing fast, and its power is too.  BEVs are now
>> practical for many drivers, sometimes as an only vehicle.
>> 
>> Hydrogen fueling is barely growing at all.  FCEVs still aren't practical
>> transportation for anyone outside of a limited region in California.
>> 
>> BEVs have all the momentum, and I just don't see that changing.
>> 
>> Twenty years ago, FCEVs *could* have succeeded, if the manufacturers had
>> really wanted them to.  But they didn't, so FCEVs missed the road vehicle
>> alt-fuel train.  I could be wrong, but I don't think there'll be another.
>> 
>> David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey
>> 
>> To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my
>> offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt
>> 
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>    I think; therefore, I'm alone in the universe.
>> 
>>                        -- Vern, "Over the Hedge"
>> 
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Address messages to [email protected]
>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20210815/565aa0e9/attachment.html>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Address messages to [email protected]
>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to [email protected]
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 

_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to