I will disagree with the first line in your statement “ H2 is not nearly as 
good for cars as batteries”, and repeat what I tell everyone - it depends. If a 
BEV cannot do the job, and meet the duty cycle I need, it clearly isn’t better 
than most anything.

When my wife needed a new car in 2015, I urged her to try one of the limited 
number of BEVs available as a possible option. She took one look at the specs, 
and said emphatically “no.” She bought a fuel cell car instead, which met her 
needs perfectly.

For my work, the same. My driving needs would have precluded a BEV.

I will say that since my wife has retired, and has different needs, I will 
again suggest that she consider a BEV as an option.

H2 not nearly as good? No way, and I can’t understand why anyone would say that.

- Mark

Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone

> On Aug 13, 2021, at 11:32 AM, Larry Gales <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Well, H2 is not nearly as good for cars as batteries, but truly green H2 
> (created through electrolysis) certainly can be very clean and could likely 
> be very useful in long range transport (ships, airplanes, and possibly long 
> range trucks).
> 
> It turns out that a recent analysis shows that "blue" H2, produced from 
> natural gas with carbon capture is not clean at all, but true green H2 (from 
> electrolysis) should be very important in the future.  So the headline:
> 
>       Hydrogen isn't green at all
> 
> is very, very wrong.
> 
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 12:31 AM Mark Abramowitz via EV <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Only looking at what you posted, you draw a very false conclusion from the 
>> data.
>> 
>> You’ve connected fossil hydrogen with that going into a car’s tank. Well, 
>> yes, you can do that, much like you use fossil gas or coal to produce 
>> electricity to run a BEV. But most hydrogen in transportation is not 
>> fossil-derived, and the entire industry is moving towards 100% 
>> “decarbonized” hydrogen, with most believing that “green” hydrogen will be 
>> everywhere very soon.
>> 
>> I haven’t looked at the “blue hydrogen” data, so can’t critique it, but the 
>> use of colors really confusing things because if you are looking for GHG 
>> impacts, the most direct measure is a CI score.
>> 
>> Many incentives are there in transportation for 100% Renewable H2, and while 
>> I get 90% renewable hydrogen when I fill my fuel cell electric vehicle (they 
>> *are* electric), I look at the grid numbers and see renewable numbers of as 
>> low as 11%, depending on the time of day. The rest is fossil.
>> 
>> So who is putting out more GHGs?
>> 
>> This is the problem with analysis that don’t analyze the real world as most 
>> would view the data.
>> 
>> - Mark
>> 
>> Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
>> 
>> > On Aug 12, 2021, at 2:20 PM, Peri Hartman via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > 
>> > For Many, Hydrogen Is the Fuel of the Future. New Research Raises Doubts.
>> > https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/climate/hydrogen-fuel-natural-gas-pollution.html
>> > 
>> > ...
>> > The main stumbling block: Most hydrogen used today is extracted from 
>> > natural gas in a process that requires a lot of energy and emits vast 
>> > amounts of carbon dioxide. Producing natural gas also releases methane, a 
>> > particularly potent greenhouse gas.
>> > ...
>> > And while the natural gas industry has proposed capturing that carbon 
>> > dioxide — creating what it promotes as emissions-free, “blue” hydrogen — 
>> > even that fuel still emits more across its entire supply chain than simply 
>> > burning natural gas, according to the paper, published Thursday in the 
>> > Energy Science & Engineering journal by researchers from Cornell and 
>> > Stanford Universities.
>> > ...
>> > The researchers assumed that 3.5 percent of the gas drilled from the 
>> > ground leaks into the atmosphere, an assumption that draws on mounting 
>> > research that has found that drilling for natural gas emits far more 
>> > methane than previously known.
>> > 
>> > They also took into account the natural gas required to power the carbon 
>> > capture technology. In all, they found that the greenhouse gas footprint 
>> > of blue hydrogen was more than 20 percent greater than burning natural gas 
>> > or coal for heat.
>> > ...
>> > Jack Brouwer, director of the National Fuel Cell Research Center at the 
>> > University of California, Irvine, said that hydrogen would ultimately need 
>> > to be made using renewable energy to produce what the industry calls green 
>> > hydrogen, which uses renewable energy to split water into its constituent 
>> > parts, hydrogen and oxygen. That, he said, would eliminate the fossil and 
>> > the methane leaks.
>> > ...
>> > Today, very little hydrogen is green, because the process involved — 
>> > electrolyzing water to separate hydrogen atoms from oxygen — is hugely 
>> > energy intensive. In most places, there simply isn’t enough renewable 
>> > energy to produce vast amounts of green hydrogen. (Although if the world 
>> > does start to produce excess renewable energy, converting it to hydrogen 
>> > would be one way to store it.)
>> > ...
>> > 
>> > -----------
>> > 
>> > I'm glad to see this published mainstream. People don't seem to think 
>> > about the source for hydrogen, only about the the aspect of filling a tank 
>> > in a few minutes and driving off. Long live EVs !!!
>> > 
>> > Peri
>> > 
>> > << Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Address messages to [email protected]
>> > No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> > ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> > LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> > 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Address messages to [email protected]
>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> Larry Gales
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20210814/cdb20cf4/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to