On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, James Higgo wrote: > Of course, 'your' current OM, which includes reading this email, is > unrelated to 'my current' OM. But since all OMs exist I can be sure that > there will be an OM which includs 'I am Bruno and I am reading this merde'.
You are James. Bruno is Bruno. Why is James locked into the James OMs and Bruno locked into the Bruno OMs? Why don't James OMs become Bruno OMs? You can say they do, somewhere... but that somewhere is not here. That somewhere is the same somewhere where James will try to explain to me why time doesn't exist -- but that somewhere is not here, therefore, doesn't that provide for a definition of "I" ? James -- can there be difference without time? What I mean is, as soon as there is difference, doesn't that demand that time exist as well? Scott