So what is it, this mystical soul, that 'transits' OMs?
----- Original Message -----
From: George Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: on formally indescribable merde


>
>
> James Higgo wrote:
>
> > Another point: come on guys, explain how one OM 'becomes' another. If it
> > becomes another then 'both OMs' are 'OM1 that becomes OM2 at (internal)
time
> > t'. Put up or shut up about this  'transiting', which is the core of he
QTI
> > debate.
> >
> > James
> >
>
> This reminds me of Zeno's paradox.... How can achilles go from point A to
point
> C since he must go through point B1, B2 B3... first.. The fact is that
Achilles
> has, at any point, a velocity vector.  At each point, he is "transiting."
At
> each point he has the perception of movement even though each single point
does
> not describe a whole trajectory.
>
> George
>
>

Reply via email to