So what is it, this mystical soul, that 'transits' OMs? ----- Original Message ----- From: George Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:34 AM Subject: Re: on formally indescribable merde
> > > James Higgo wrote: > > > Another point: come on guys, explain how one OM 'becomes' another. If it > > becomes another then 'both OMs' are 'OM1 that becomes OM2 at (internal) time > > t'. Put up or shut up about this 'transiting', which is the core of he QTI > > debate. > > > > James > > > > This reminds me of Zeno's paradox.... How can achilles go from point A to point > C since he must go through point B1, B2 B3... first.. The fact is that Achilles > has, at any point, a velocity vector. At each point, he is "transiting." At > each point he has the perception of movement even though each single point does > not describe a whole trajectory. > > George > >
