James Higgo wrote: > Another point: come on guys, explain how one OM 'becomes' another. If it > becomes another then 'both OMs' are 'OM1 that becomes OM2 at (internal) time > t'. Put up or shut up about this 'transiting', which is the core of he QTI > debate. > > James > This reminds me of Zeno's paradox.... How can achilles go from point A to point C since he must go through point B1, B2 B3... first.. The fact is that Achilles has, at any point, a velocity vector. At each point, he is "transiting." At each point he has the perception of movement even though each single point does not describe a whole trajectory. George
- Re: on formally indescribable merde Jacques Mallah
- Re: on formally indescribable merde Marchal
- Re: on formally indescribable merde George Levy
- Re: on formally indescribable merde James Higgo
- Re: on formally indescribable merde George Levy
- Re: on formally indescribable merde James Higgo
- Re: on formally indescribable merd... Michael Rosefield
- Re: on formally indescribable ... James Higgo
- Re: on formally indescribable merde Marchal
- Re: on formally indescribable merde James Higgo
- Re: on formally indescribable merde Scott D. Yelich
- Re: on formally indescribable merde James Higgo
- Re: on formally indescribable merd... Scott D. Yelich
- Re: on formally indescribable ... James Higgo
- Re: on formally indescribable merde Marchal

