Charles Goodwin wrote:

>I was talking about the laws of physics. It's possible in principle for 
>those to be known (I think). One can also know all there is
>to know while knowing that one's knowledge is incomplete! Obviously a 
>complete description of reality is impossible (where would you
>store the information about the state of every particle?) but a complete 
>codified description of how reality works is another story.

All right. I was just saying that concerning number theoretical truth,
we can show there is no complete description, even in codified ways.


Reply via email to