Charles Goodwin wrote: >I was talking about the laws of physics. It's possible in principle for >those to be known (I think). One can also know all there is >to know while knowing that one's knowledge is incomplete! Obviously a >complete description of reality is impossible (where would you >store the information about the state of every particle?) but a complete >codified description of how reality works is another story.
All right. I was just saying that concerning number theoretical truth, we can show there is no complete description, even in codified ways. Bruno