--- Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As has been previously mentioned, the RSSA is simply > measure conditional upon the observer being who > it/he/she is.
> > The "RSSA values" can't be used because there > > isn't any way to compare *different* observers in > > the RSSA. > > I would not be so sure about this! See the first quote. How do you reconcile that? > > BTW, don't think that just because we're > > discussing on this thread, you're off the hook > > with respect to my point on the other thread that > > Bayesian reasoning is the same as the ASSA. > > What rot! Bayesian reasoning underpins both systems. > The real difference between them is whether one > accepts the concept of history. The real difference is that you refuse, by some trick of doublethink, to apply Bayesian reasoning to age and across different observers. ===== - - - - - - - Jacques Mallah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate "I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum My URL: http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com