# Re: Quantum Immortality and Information Flow

```George Levy writes:

```
`Hi Quentin, Stathis, Bruno`
```
```
It all depends how you see the plenitude, OMs and the branching. Is consciousness like a traveller in a network of roads traversing the plenitude, some roads branching some roads merging?
```
```
If yes then you could have several independent consciousness occupying the same spot, or the same OM. Then their measure at that spot is their sum. This approach is a third person point of view and it leads to the concept of absolute measure.
```
```
If you see consiousness as the road itself, then measure is not increased after a merge and does not decrease after a split. An OM is just a point on the road. If the road turns unexpectedly to avoids an obstacle (like quantum suicide or just plain death), then consiousness will just move on into a direction which has a low 3-rd person probability but unity first person probability. Viewing consciousness as a network of roads is a first person point of view and it leads to the concept of relative measure: Measure is always 1 where you are. From a given point you may reach many points - Then measure increases with respect to that point. Or reversibly, from many points you may reach only one point. Then measure decreases.
```
Bruno writes:

```
>neither elimination of information, nor duplication of information.
```
```
The crux of the matter is the concept of indistinguishability: whether you consider two identical persons (OMs) occupying two identical universes the same person (point on the road). It is clear that if you consider the problem from the information angle, then duplication of information does not increase the measure of that information. This would support the relative interpretation of measure.
```

```
In addition to the above arguments, consider the problem from the point of view of the subject. If multiple copies of a person are created and run in parallel for a period, what difference does this make to his experience? It seems to me that there is no test or experiment the person could do which would allow him to determine if he is living in a period of high measure or low measure. If an OM is the smallest discernible unit of conscious experience, it therefore seems reasonable to treat multiple instantiations of the same OM as one OM.
```

Stathis Papaioannou

_________________________________________________________________
```
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
```
```