Hi, 1Z wrote: > I will take the stuff that seems solid to me as primary reality until > demostrated > otherwise.
This was not the point... the point was to make you understand that Bruno has proved that *IF* computationalism is true *THEN* primary reality does not exists ! It even doesn't mean anything in this context. So the point is not that you accept or not computationalism and stuffy/not stuffy stuff... It is just that if you accept computationalism you cannot accept a primary reality... If you do not (as it seems) then it's normal, but you cannot claim computationalism at the same time, Bruno proved that it is not compatible. Regards, Quentin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
