1Z wrote:
> I will take the stuff that seems solid to me as primary reality until
> demostrated
> otherwise.

This was not the point... the point was to make you understand that
Bruno has proved that *IF* computationalism is true *THEN* primary
reality does not exists ! It even doesn't mean anything in this

So the point is not that you accept or not computationalism and
stuffy/not stuffy stuff... It is just that if you accept
computationalism you cannot accept a primary reality... If you do not
(as it seems) then it's normal, but you cannot claim computationalism
at the same time, Bruno proved that it is not compatible.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to