Brent meeker writes (quoting Peter Jones, Quentin Anciaux and SP):

> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Le Dimanche 20 Août 2006 05:17, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
> >>
> >>>Peter Jones writes (quoting SP):
> >>>
> >>>>>What about an inputless computer program, running deterministically
> >>>>>like a recording. Would that count as a program at all,
> >>>>
> >>>>It would be a trivial case.
> >>>
> >>>Trivial does not mean false.
> >>
> >>It seems to me that the set of inputless programs contains the set of 
> >>programs 
> >>which have inputs. Because a program which have inputs could be written as 
> >>the following inputless program :
> >>
> >>
> >>The resulting program is input less but the "substructure" denominated CODE 
> >>here is not inputless, it takes the hardcoded input.
> >>
> >>So in any case I don't see why inputless program should be "trivial case".
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Quentin
> I thought the question was not about computation, but whether a program was 
> intelligent or conscious.  I think that intelligence means being able to 
> respond to a 
> variety of differenet inputs.  So above |CODE| might be intelligent but not 
> the 
> overall inputless program.

OK, I suppose you could say "I'm intelligent" but not "I + my environment are 
That still allows that an inputless program might contain intelligent beings, 
and you are left 
with the problem of how to decide whether a physical system is implementing 
such a program 
given that you can't talk to it.

Stathis Papaioannou
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to