Le 14-mars-07, à 08:15, Kim Jones a écrit :
> I believe that the 'ability to conceive of nothing' - in a Loebian > machine context might be forbidden under comp (I could be wrong) The problem with words like "nothing" and "everything" is that they have as many meaning than there are theories or philosophical frame. As example, you cannot represent the quantum vacuum by the empty set. Those are completely different and opposite notion of nothingness. The empty set can be simulated by a simple non universal machine. The quantum void is already turing universal. I am not sure that a notion of nothingness can have some absolute meaning. It is rich and interesting, but hardly basic and primitive. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
