Le 15-mars-07, à 01:38, David Nyman a écrit :

> On Mar 14, 10:18 pm, "Stathis Papaioannou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Perhaps using the term "existence" for mathematical objects is 
>> misleading.
>> It doesn't mean they exist as separate objects in the real world,  
>> just that
>> they exist as concepts. This is mathematical Platonism.
> Yes, I understand.  I guess I'm saying that nevertheless I can
> conceive of a radical negation in which even Platonic objects have no
> existence, conceptual or otherwise. Consequently AFAICS arguments for
> Platonic 'necessity' are in fact derived wholly from contingent states
> of affairs.

True. But the fact that the human conception of platonic necessity is 
derived from contingent facts does not necessarily change the necessity 
character of platonic truth.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to