On 14/03/2007, at 5:59 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:

>> nevertheless
>> I think we need more on question 1
>> Questions 2 and 3 appear to have answers of sorts
>> Kim Jones
> What kind of statement would you regard as an answer to why there  
> is something rather than nothing?  For example here are some  
> possible answers:
> 1. What is there?  Everything!  What isn't there?  Nothing!
> 2. Nothing is unstable (Frank Wilczek, Nobelist physics)
> 3. Why should Nothing be the default and Something need an  
> explanation?
> 4. The universe is just Nothing rearranged (Vic Stenger, Yonatan  
> Fishman)
> I think it's one of those questions that seems as if it should have  
> answer because it is so simple and clear, but which on reflection  
> you find isn't clear at all.  What is Nothing?  Can you conceive of  
> Nothing?  Is absolute Nothing a coherent concept or is Nothing just  
> absence of matter, i.e. empty space.
> Brent Meeker

I believe that the 'ability to conceive of nothing' -  in a Loebian  
machine context might be forbidden under comp (I could be wrong)

I cannot personally conceive of nothing. All of your four statements  
may well apply - its just not the whole description. Nothing is BIG  
enough to encompass at least four descriptive statements - it can  
surely hold a few more

doing pretty well for a bunch of nothin

Can we say that nothing is *big* in some sense and therefore have  
that property? It's a nonsensical idea but you never know

Is nothing big or small



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to