Brent Meeker wrote:
> That's a good argument assuming some laws of physics.  But as I understood 
> it, the "measure problem" was to explain the law-like evolution of the 
> universe as a opposed to a chaotic/random/white-rabbit universe.  Is it 
> your interpretation that, among all possible worlds, somebody has to live 
> in law-like ones; so it might as well be us?

Yes. See my other post today. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to