On 28 Jul 2009, at 05:56, Rex Allen wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Brent  
> Meeker<meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think that's a misuse of "ontology".  When we discuss the atomic  
>> theory of
>> matter the ontology is a set of elementary particles, including  
>> their couplings
>> and dynamics.
>
>
> I think most of us are using "ontology" in the sense of definition 1,
> below.  But you keep introducing the term in the sense of definition
> 2.  I'd noticed it before on David's previous "dream" thread.
>
> Ontology
>
> 1. That department of the science of metaphysics which investigates
> and explains the nature and essential properties and relations of all
> beings, as such, or the principles and causes of being.
>
> 2. A systematic arrangement of all of the important categories of
> objects or concepts which exist in some field of discourse, showing
> the relations between them.


Good point. I use always "ontology" in the first sense.

Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to