Jason:
I see what you are saying up at our level of understanding, I do not
know how to present that in a technically convincing matter.
Ronald
On Nov 20, 7:07 pm, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ronald,
>
> Right, I think that is what he implied and it is something I agree with.
> There is only so much that can be learned about this universe, and physical
> exploration by locomotion or even observation is limited in many ways.
> Rather than moving around to other places to see what can be, with an
> appropriate understanding of the physical laws one could create any
> configuration of matter they wanted. Simulate biology and evolution to find
> out what kinds of life might be out there; if the universe is infinitely
> large, then simulation is more than just imagination, one would be
> discovering things which are actually real, somewhere. The physical laws
> and the possible configurations of matter are also a small part of what is
> possible. Mathematics and simulation are two tools which provide a window
> into what exists in other universes. If all possible universes exist then
> imagination is the ultimate form of exploration. Ultimately, the limits of
> consciousness itself, will be explored. What is it that can be perceived,
> felt, experienced, by conscious minds. This inward exploration may be every
> bit as rich as the "outward" exploration of
> simulating/modeling/analyzing possible structures.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:39 PM, ronaldheld <ronaldh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Jason:
> > Do you want to add more? I know Q meant that mental exploration was
> > more important than the physical
> > .Ronald
>
> > On Nov 18, 1:53 pm, Jason <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ronald,
>
> > > Hope it isn't too late. I think the last line from Q in the last
> > > episode of the next generation is relevant:
>
> > > Q: "That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and
> > > studying nebulae, but charting the unknown possibilities of
> > > existence."
>
> > > Jason
>
> > > On Nov 5, 3:42 pm, ronaldheld <ronaldh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Several years ago, I gave a talk mostly based on Tegmark's work. I
> > > > would like to give an updated talk with other POVs within 40 minutes.
> > > > Any suggestions, considering the Trek fan audience, would be
> > > > appreciated.
> > > > Ronald- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Everything List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
