On 8/9/2011 9:48 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
That is explained as an illusion in GR for an eternal black hole.
In Susskinds theory the in-falling person is both smeared (in
strings) on the horizon and *also* destroyed in the singularity,
so that when the BH evaporates the information is recovered.
While I don't understand all the details of Susskind's theory, my
understanding was that Susskind is generally accepted to have won his
bet with Stephen Hawking in so far as information is not destroyed in
Incidentally, I have a paper written by a friend who explains in fairly
easily understood mathematics (some calculus needed) why Susskind's idea
of black hole complementarity is probably wrong. It's in PDF and is
only 107Kb. I'll send it to anyone who's interested.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at