I have no problem(for now) accepting the Big Bang theory+inflation
paradigm. I admit I do not know what dark matter is or how many
inflaton fields there are. I can accept the cosmological constant as
the source of dark energy. It seems better at this time to have the
two dark quantities than to alter Einsteins's General Relativity.
More observations will be needed.
On Jan 25, 7:41 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 4:16 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
> >> Sounds like the sophistry you accuse physcists of. While 'everything' may
> >> be as
> >> uninformative a 'nothing', they seem pretty distinct to me.
> > Exactly how is this distinction made? Is it merely semantics for you,
> > this difference?
> Well, for one, if everything exists I'm around to see somethings.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at