Brent, thanks for the appreciation!
My point was simply that anybody's 'truth' is conditioned.
We have no (approvable?) authority for an ABSOLUTE truth. Whatever "WE"
accept is "human".
What is Mother Nature accepting?
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 6/28/2012 12:46 PM, John Mikes wrote:
>> I am the 3rd kind of the two: think not in binary, just in plain peasant
>> logic, when 1 and 1 make 11, nothing more.
>> So Bruno's "absolute truth" may have even more relatives.
> Or less facetiously, (The father of Kirsten)+(The father of
> Gennifer)=(One, me) and (one raindrop)+(one raindrop)=(one raindrop). So
> whether successor(x)=(x+1) depends on the applicability of arithmetic to
> your model.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe@
> **googlegroups.com <everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at