On 7/10/2012 10:49 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
There is something deeply religious in many scientifics in his quest to expand their Truth. And there is also something very philosophical indeed. But they ignore both. They ignore their beliefs and their positivistic metaphisics, born in the disputes between nominalists and realists during the middle ages. And there is no stronger faith than the faith that see himself as aboslute truth about everithing, that ignores its shorcomings and its history, and that show contempt or even denial of entire parts of the reality.

This furious scientist proselitism us understandable and it is even healthy, because the idea of a objective scientist with no emotions is hypocrite.

That shows once again that faith is something a society can not live without,. because faith in ultimate, unexplained truths is the prerequisite for any coordinated social action. And the truths upon which a society build itself is its most valuable treasure.

This seems of topic, but I suggest something to discuss here: shared human conscience. We live in a shared virtual conscience. It is shared because we share the context and it is virtual because it depends in the context of shared beliefs: beliefs in the myths and histories that created our country, beliefs in some moral laws, beliefs in the prestige of some special humans: priests, scientifics, political figures of the past and the present. We can not verify our beliefs because we have no time and no knowledge to do so. So we resort to faith. faith in authority: being scientific, political or anything. common faith and legitimated authority is necessary to live with others and thus whenever a society is build, it needs it.

I think you are confounding faith and trust. Trust is something society, and all of us, cannot live without. But trust doesn't mean belief without evidence. As Ronald Reagan famously said, "Trust, but verify." Faith means trusting and never trying to verify. That we can live without. We have trust in authorities who have proven trustworthy in the past. We bet on many things even though we never have certain knowledge, but that doesn't mean we have no knowledge or that we should not test our knowledge.


And the assault of the foundational social truths and the core beliefs of the people is central for any battle for power

Exactly what happens when beliefs are faith and are divorced from empirical test - then all that remains is a struggle for power to impose arbitrary beliefs to be held on faith.

Brent


Do the hawking Theory of everything says something about this? I´m soure, because it is about everyhing, Isn´t?



2012/7/7 Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be <mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>>


    On 07 Jul 2012, at 15:31, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:

        My comments to Grand Design by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, 
especially
        to the statement from the book

        “Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is 
dead.
        Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, 
particularly
        physics. Scientists have become the bearers of the torch of discovery 
in our
        quest for knowledge.”

        http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/07/philosophy-is-dead.html



    I am not so much in favor of "professional philosophers", which does not 
mean that
    some of them do good ... science (like Maudlin, Slezak, even McGuin: it is 
real
    reasoning).

    But that statement looks like the blind arrogance of physics, which ignores 
the mind
    body problem systematically for years.

    Consciousness might be the grain of sand which will remind us that we might 
try to
    be a bit more modest.

    To say that scientists have become the bearer of the knowledge quest is a 
truism
    becoming false when the scientist put a problem under the rug.

    Bruno


    http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ <http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/%7Emarchal/>




-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    "Everything List" group.
    To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to