What exactly determines the 10^500 number?
On 8/22/2012 9:19 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
That there are 10^500 possible configurations of the monads. Scientist believe that each possible universe contains but one kind of monad..On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Hi Richard Ruquist What is the landscape problem ? Roger Clough, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 8/22/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function." ----- Receiving the following content ----- *From:* Richard Ruquist <mailto:[email protected]> *Receiver:* everything-list <mailto:[email protected]> *Time:* 2012-08-21, 21:26:58 *Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology Stephan, I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant� varied monotonically across the universe. Richard On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 8/21/2012 3:58 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:燬teinberg P. Soft Physics from RHIC to the LHC.�燼 rXiv:nucl-ex/09031471, 2009. 燢ovtum PK, Son DT & Starinets AO. Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum Field Theories from Black Hole Physics. arXiv:hep-th/0405231.牋� Good! Now to see if there any any other possible explanations that do not have the landscape problem...On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 8/21/2012 3:39 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma� already found at the LHC and several other sites.Hi Richard, 牋� Could you link some sources on this?On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:Hi guys, � Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist--爄 nstead, they represent things that exist. Anything in equation form is itself nonphysical, although the equations might describe something physical.The equations of string theory describe strings.� So how does it follow that strings aren't real.� That's like saying a sentence that describes my house shows that my house isn't real. I agree that string theory (or any other theory) is a model of reality and not reality itself.� But, if it's correct, it refers to reality or at least some part of reality - like, "My house is green." refers to a part of reality, but "My house is blue." does not. Brent牋� When and if string theory makes a prediction that is then found to have a physical demonstration we might be more confident that it is useful as a physics theory and not just an exercise in beautiful advanced mathematics. The LHC is looking for such evidence...� For example, if I live at 23 Main street, 23 Main Street is not my house, it is my address.� � � � Roger Clough, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 8/21/2012--
-- Onward! Stephen "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." ~ Francis Bacon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
