What exactly determines the 10^500 number?

On 8/22/2012 9:19 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
That there are 10^500 possible configurations of the monads.
Scientist believe that each possible universe
contains but one kind of monad..

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    Hi Richard Ruquist
    What is the landscape problem ?
    Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>
    Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
    everything could function."

        ----- Receiving the following content -----
        *From:* Richard Ruquist <mailto:yann...@gmail.com>
        *Receiver:* everything-list
        *Time:* 2012-08-21, 21:26:58
        *Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully
        best mereology


        I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was
        consistent with the astronomical observations that the
        hyperfine constant�
        varied monotonically across the universe.

        On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Stephen P. King
        <stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

            On 8/21/2012 3:58 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
            燬teinberg P. Soft Physics from RHIC to the LHC.�燼
            rXiv:nucl-ex/09031471, 2009.

            燢ovtum PK, Son DT & Starinets AO. Viscosity in Strongly
            Interacting Quantum
            Field Theories from Black Hole Physics.

            牋� Good! Now to see if there any any other possible
            explanations that do not have the landscape problem...

            On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Stephen P. King
            <stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

                On 8/21/2012 3:39 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
                String theory predicts the viscosity of the
                quark-gluon plasma�
                already found at the LHC and several other sites.

                Hi Richard,

                牋� Could you link some sources on this?

                On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P. King
                <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

                    On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
                    On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
                    Hi guys,
                    Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist--爄
                    nstead, they represent things that exist.
                    Anything in equation form is itself
                    nonphysical, although the equations
                    might describe something physical.

                    The equations of string theory describe
                    strings.� So how does it follow that strings
                    aren't real.� That's like saying a sentence
                    that describes my house shows that my house
                    isn't real.

                    I agree that string theory (or any other
                    theory) is a model of reality and not reality
                    itself.� But, if it's correct, it refers to
                    reality or at least some part of reality -
                    like, "My house is green." refers to a part of
                    reality, but "My house is blue." does not.


                    牋� When and if string theory makes a prediction
                    that is then found to have a physical
                    demonstration we might be more confident that it
                    is useful as a physics theory and not just an
                    exercise in beautiful advanced mathematics. The
                    LHC is looking for such evidence...

                    For example, if I live at 23 Main street, 23
                    Main Street is not my house,
                    it is my address.�
                    Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net




"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to