Hi Roger,
I agree in spirit with you but cringe at the use of the word
"filled". Do you have any ideas as to the mereological relation between
monads?
On 8/23/2012 8:08 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Richard,
There are an infinite number of different monads, since
the world is filled with them and each is a
different perspective on the whole of the rest.
Not only that, but they keep changing, as
all life does.
Roger Clough, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
8/23/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
everything could function."
----- Receiving the following content -----
*From:* Stephen P. King <mailto:[email protected]>
*Receiver:* everything-list <mailto:[email protected]>
*Time:* 2012-08-22, 11:24:16
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best
mereology
What exactly determines the 10^500 number?
On 8/22/2012 9:19 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
That there are 10^500 possible configurations of the monads.
Scientist believe that each possible universe
contains but one kind of monad..
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
What is the landscape problem ?
Roger Clough, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
8/22/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent
him so everything could function."
----- Receiving the following content -----
*From:* Richard Ruquist <mailto:[email protected]>
*Receiver:* everything-list
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Time:* 2012-08-21, 21:26:58
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and
hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each
monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the
hyperfine constant
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Stephen P. King
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 8/21/2012 3:58 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
燬teinberg P. Soft Physics from RHIC to the LHC.
燼rXiv:nucl-ex/09031471, 2009.
燢ovtum PK, Son DT & Starinets AO. Viscosity in
Strongly Interacting Quantum
Field Theories from Black Hole Physics.
arXiv:hep-th/0405231.
牋 Good! Now to see if there any any other possible
explanations that do not have the landscape problem...
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Stephen P. King
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 8/21/2012 3:39 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
String theory predicts the viscosity of the
quark-gluon plasma
already found at the LHC and several other sites.
Hi Richard,
牋 Could you link some sources on this?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P.
King <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
Neither CYM's nor strings physically
exist--爄nstead, they represent things
that exist.
Anything in equation form is itself
nonphysical, although the equations
might describe something physical.
The equations of string theory describe
strings. So how does it follow that
strings aren't real. That's like saying a
sentence that describes my house shows
that my house isn't real.
I agree that string theory (or any other
theory) is a model of reality and not
reality itself. But, if it's correct, it
refers to reality or at least some part of
reality - like, "My house is green."
refers to a part of reality, but "My house
is blue." does not.
Brent
牋 When and if string theory makes a
prediction that is then found to have a
physical demonstration we might be more
confident that it is useful as a physics
theory and not just an exercise in
beautiful advanced mathematics. The LHC is
looking for such evidence...
For example, if I live at 23 Main street,
23 Main Street is not my house,
it is my address.
Roger Clough, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
8/21/2012
--
--
Onward!
Stephen
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.