On 8/22/2012 4:04 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Now this is interesting: "Points have necessary existence, all being present simultaneously in the physical object A. 15.States are possible, making a Chu space a kind of a Kripke structure [Gup93]:
only *one state at a time* may be chosen from the menu X of alternatives.

Seems that divine intervention may be an assumption. I wonder who does the choosing. May I suggest Godellian consciousness?

Dear Richard,

No need for divine intervention! I am not sure what "Godellian consciousness" is. Let me comment a bit more on this part of Pratt's idea. The choice mechanism that I have worked out uses a tournament styled system. It basically asks the question: what is the most consistent Boolean solution for the set of observers involved? It seems to follow the general outlines of pricing theory and auction theory in economics and has hints of Nash equilibria. This makes sense since it would be modeled by game theory. My conjecture is that quantum entanglement allows for the connections (defined as bisimulations) between monads to exploit EPR effects to maximize the efficiency of the computations such that classical signaling is not needed (which gets around the "no windows" rule). This latter idea is still very much unbaked.



"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to