On 8/22/2012 4:04 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Now this is interesting: "Points have necessary existence, all being
present simultaneously in the physical object A.
15.States are possible, making a Chu space a kind of a Kripke
only *one state at a time* may be chosen from the menu X of alternatives.
Seems that divine intervention may be an assumption. I wonder who does
the choosing. May I suggest Godellian consciousness?
No need for divine intervention! I am not sure what "Godellian
consciousness" is. Let me comment a bit more on this part of Pratt's
idea. The choice mechanism that I have worked out uses a tournament
styled system. It basically asks the question: what is the most
consistent Boolean solution for the set of observers involved? It seems
to follow the general outlines of pricing theory and auction theory in
economics and has hints of Nash equilibria. This makes sense since it
would be modeled by game theory. My conjecture is that quantum
entanglement allows for the connections (defined as bisimulations)
between monads to exploit EPR effects to maximize the efficiency of the
computations such that classical signaling is not needed (which gets
around the "no windows" rule). This latter idea is still very much unbaked.
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at