Hi Bruno Marchal Applying science to religion can be no more successful than applying science to poetry. Both poetry and religion have to be experienced if they are of any use at all, and science is a moron with regard to experiential knowledge.
Roger Clough, [email protected] 9/12/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so that everything could function." ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-12, 05:26:53 Subject: Re: The poverty of computers On 11 Sep 2012, at 18:42, John Clark wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > Science is not a field, but a methodology, or even just a human (or machine) > attitude. Why not apply it in theology? It has been, Nice to hear that. its just that the devout don't like the answers science has come up with. I agree. Such devout illustrate bad faith. Anyone "believing" in God cannot have any problem with science, if only because science, well understood, can only ask question and suggest temporary theories. Not answering about the step3 ---> step4 makes you looking like a devout atheist embarrassed by the scientific attitude on the mind body problem. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
