Hi Bruno Marchal
Applying science to religion can be no more successful than
applying science to poetry. Both poetry and religion have to be
experienced if they are of any use at all, and science
is a moron with regard to experiential knowledge.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function."
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: Bruno Marchal
Time: 2012-09-12, 05:26:53
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 11 Sep 2012, at 18:42, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> Science is not a field, but a methodology, or even just a human (or machine)
> attitude. Why not apply it in theology?
It has been,
Nice to hear that.
its just that the devout don't like the answers science has come up with.
I agree. Such devout illustrate bad faith. Anyone "believing" in God cannot
have any problem with science, if only because science, well understood, can
only ask question and suggest temporary theories.
Not answering about the step3 ---> step4 makes you looking like a devout
atheist embarrassed by the scientific attitude on the mind body problem.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at