On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Say that you have been captured by the [totalitarian fiend of your choice],
> and are tied up in a basement somewhere. The torture has begun, and is has
> become clear that it will continue to get worse until you 'become one of
> Fortunately you have been supplied by your team with a 'Chalmers' device,
> which allows you to know exactly what to say and do to convince your captors
> that you have turned and become 'one of them' in earnest. Using real-time em
> field sensitivity and quantum computing, the computational states are not
> only analyzed, but predicted for everyone in the room so that you are
> furnished with the best lines and gestures, sobbing, explaining, etc.
> The Chalmers device allows you to be a flawless actor. Is there any reason
> that this wouldn't work in theory? What law says that acting can only be so
> good, and beyond that you actually have to 'love Big Brother' in order to
> seem like you do? If we had a device that would allow us to control our
> bodies, emotions, and minds precisely and absolutely, why couldn't we use
> that device as a mask?
The perfect actor might believe it or he might just be acting. Acting
is top-down replacement, not bottom-up replacement. Bottom-up
replacement would involve replacing a part of your brain so that you
didn't notice any difference and no-one else noticed any difference.
> Part II
> Instead of replacing parts of the brain with perfect functional replicas,
> what if we used a hot wire to ablate or burn parts of the brain. If I burn
> one region, you lose the power of speech. If I burn another, you lose all
> understanding of physics and math. If I burn another, you go into a coma. I
> can do different combinations of ablation on different subjects, but would
> there be any case in which someone who was dead could be induced to speak or
> solve math problems? Why not? I could replace the motherboard of a burned
> out computer with any other compatible motherboard and expect to pick up
> right where I left off. If I toasted a critical part of any computer, there
> is no loss of potential functionality to any of the other parts, whether
> that part is implicated in the boot up process or not. Just because a
> computer won't boot doesn't mean that it can't be easily repaired. Not so
> with a living organism. If you blow out a simple power supply in a
> biological system, it will never run again - not even a little bit.
> What say ye?
Replacing body parts that break down with artificial ones is
well-established in the medical industry, and will become increasingly
so in future as the devices become more sophisticated.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at