On Monday, November 19, 2012 4:37:44 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:29:58AM -0800, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > > > What I am asking is why would the single multiverse be any less > dependent > > upon multiplicity to accomplish its infinities of preserved separations > > than a single universe does? If a universe needs a multiverse to justify > > superposition, then why doesn't a multiverse also need a meta-multiverse > to > > keep track of all the possible ways of regulating the creation and > > preservation of universes? How is infinite regress avoided? > > > > There is no regress in the picture. Please reread my text (or my book) > I have no clue as to why you are postulating one???? Can anyone else > explain Craig's concerns? >
I'm postulating infinite regress because the idea that universes are being created and preserved implies an meta-universal support which also must be made of some kind of information-theoretic functionality which would have its own meta-quantum reasoning for existing. How does having many worlds better explain the existence of any world or world-making condition? Mainly it buries the problem under a mountain of infinities. Craig > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected]<javascript:> > University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/dRlFekVTZ3UJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
