Hi Stephen P. King Hintakka's concept of truth is what is called "pragmatic truth", or "scientific truth". It's the same as Peirce's-- namely, what results when you carry out a particular protocol.
[Roger Clough], [[email protected]] 11/30/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-02, 18:20:11 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/2/2012 1:23 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> Are you familiar with Jaakko Hintikka's ideas? I am using his concept >> of game theoretic semantics to derive truth valuations. > > I read this. yes. I don't see relevant at all. > I do appreciate his linking of intention and intension, but it is a > bit trivial in the comp theory. > Dear Bruno, Hintikka's idea is to show how truth values can be coherently considered to be the result of a process and not necessarily just some a priori valuation. This makes Truth an emergent valuation, just as I content all definite properties are emergent from mutual agreements between entities. Properties, in the absence of the possibility of measurement or apprehension of some type, do not exist; they are what the 1p project onto existence. Nothing more. -- Onward! Stephen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
