2012/12/18 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> > It just want te people to argue about what must be true for these robots. > I suppose that the truth about fabrication of pieces are know and accepted > by all, so the only remaining things to communicate and hold as trur are > the ones related with the location of available pieces or things related > with truths about other robots or groups of robots. > > > > > 2012/12/18 Roger Clough <[email protected]> > >> Hi Alberto G. Corona >> >> I'd rather just take a poll. >> I feel more comfortable with data. >> >> [Roger Clough], [[email protected]] <[email protected]]> >> 12/18/2012 >> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen >> >> >> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >> *From:* Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> >> *Receiver:* everything-list <[email protected]> >> *Time:* 2012-12-18, 11:05:46 >> *Subject:* Question: Robotic truth >> >> Suppose that you are in charge of the software of a social robot. I >> mean a robot that live with other robots that collaborate to solve >> problems. These robots must repair themselves, with pieces that are located >> in the field. these pieces are scarce or they are not for free, and some >> groups of robots want your own pieces for them, so finally the >> robots�arrange�themselves in groups of collaborators that try to fabricate >> pieces and protect them from the attacks of�other�groups. Things become more >> complicated, since, for better defense and/or fabrication and/or attack the >> groups become bigger, and some subgroups are formed iinside, in order to >> have privileged access to valuable pieces in detriment of the other members >> of the big group. >> >> At a point in the programing, you have to deal with comunication of each >> robot with the fellow robots. As a result of this comunication, you must >> evaluate if what is communicated to you is true of false. If true it is >> hold in the list of true statements. �If not, it is rejected. �The true >> statements will be used for the�elaboration�of social behaviours intended to >> obtain pieces and to maintain the group of collaborators, the fabrication, >> ownership, and maybe robbery of new pieces for the future. Or else, the >> group will die, the robot will die and its lists of truths too. >> >> Since you know that finally the social robots will end >> in�arrangements�of�collaborators�in the way I described above, T�How would >> you >> design the evaluator iof true and false statements.? >> >> -- >> Alberto. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Alberto. >
-- Alberto. 2012/12/18 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> > It just want te people to argue about what must be true for these robots. > I suppose that the truth about fabrication of pieces are know and accepted > by all, so the only remaining things to communicate and hold as trur are > the ones related with the location of available pieces or things related > with truths about other robots or groups of robots. > > > > > 2012/12/18 Roger Clough <[email protected]> > >> Hi Alberto G. Corona >> >> I'd rather just take a poll. >> I feel more comfortable with data. >> >> [Roger Clough], [[email protected]] <[email protected]]> >> 12/18/2012 >> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen >> >> >> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >> *From:* Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> >> *Receiver:* everything-list <[email protected]> >> *Time:* 2012-12-18, 11:05:46 >> *Subject:* Question: Robotic truth >> >> Suppose that you are in charge of the software of a social robot. I >> mean a robot that live with other robots that collaborate to solve >> problems. These robots must repair themselves, with pieces that are located >> in the field. these pieces are scarce or they are not for free, and some >> groups of robots want your own pieces for them, so finally the >> robots�arrange�themselves in groups of collaborators that try to fabricate >> pieces and protect them from the attacks of�other�groups. Things become more >> complicated, since, for better defense and/or fabrication and/or attack the >> groups become bigger, and some subgroups are formed iinside, in order to >> have privileged access to valuable pieces in detriment of the other members >> of the big group. >> >> At a point in the programing, you have to deal with comunication of each >> robot with the fellow robots. As a result of this comunication, you must >> evaluate if what is communicated to you is true of false. If true it is >> hold in the list of true statements. �If not, it is rejected. �The true >> statements will be used for the�elaboration�of social behaviours intended to >> obtain pieces and to maintain the group of collaborators, the fabrication, >> ownership, and maybe robbery of new pieces for the future. Or else, the >> group will die, the robot will die and its lists of truths too. >> >> Since you know that finally the social robots will end >> in�arrangements�of�collaborators�in the way I described above, T�How would >> you >> design the evaluator iof true and false statements.? >> >> -- >> Alberto. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Alberto. > -- Alberto. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
