2012/12/18 Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com>

> It just want te people to argue about what must be true for these robots.
>  I suppose that the truth about fabrication of pieces are know and accepted
> by all, so the only remaining things to communicate and hold as trur are
> the ones related with the location of available pieces  or things related
> with truths about other robots or groups of robots.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/12/18 Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net>
>
>>  Hi Alberto G. Corona
>>
>> I'd rather just take a poll.
>> I feel more comfortable with data.
>>
>> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] <rclo...@verizon.net]>
>> 12/18/2012
>> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>>
>>
>> ----- Receiving the following content -----
>> *From:* Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com>
>> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>> *Time:* 2012-12-18, 11:05:46
>> *Subject:* Question: Robotic truth
>>
>>   Suppose that you are in charge of the software of a social robot. I
>> mean a robot that live with other robots that collaborate to solve
>> problems. These robots must repair themselves, with pieces that are located
>> in the field. these pieces are scarce or they are not for free, and some
>> groups of robots want your own pieces for them, so finally the
>> robots�arrange�themselves in groups of collaborators that try to fabricate
>> pieces and protect them from the attacks of�other�groups. Things become more
>> complicated, since, for better defense and/or fabrication and/or attack the
>> groups become bigger, and some subgroups are formed iinside, in order to
>> have privileged access to valuable pieces in detriment of the other members
>> of the big group.
>>
>> At a point in the programing, you have to deal with comunication of each
>> robot with the fellow robots. As a result of this comunication, you must
>> evaluate if what is communicated to you is true of false. If true it is
>> hold in the list of true statements. �If not, it is rejected. �The true
>> statements will be used for the�elaboration�of social behaviours intended to
>> obtain pieces and to maintain the group of collaborators, the fabrication,
>> ownership, and maybe robbery of new pieces for the future. Or else, the
>> group will die, the robot will die and its lists of truths too.
>>
>> Since you know that finally the social robots will end
>> in�arrangements�of�collaborators�in the way I described above, T�How would 
>> you
>> design the evaluator iof true and false statements.?
>>
>> --
>> Alberto.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alberto.
>



-- 
Alberto.


2012/12/18 Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com>

> It just want te people to argue about what must be true for these robots.
>  I suppose that the truth about fabrication of pieces are know and accepted
> by all, so the only remaining things to communicate and hold as trur are
> the ones related with the location of available pieces  or things related
> with truths about other robots or groups of robots.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/12/18 Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net>
>
>>  Hi Alberto G. Corona
>>
>> I'd rather just take a poll.
>> I feel more comfortable with data.
>>
>> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] <rclo...@verizon.net]>
>> 12/18/2012
>> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>>
>>
>> ----- Receiving the following content -----
>> *From:* Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com>
>> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>> *Time:* 2012-12-18, 11:05:46
>> *Subject:* Question: Robotic truth
>>
>>   Suppose that you are in charge of the software of a social robot. I
>> mean a robot that live with other robots that collaborate to solve
>> problems. These robots must repair themselves, with pieces that are located
>> in the field. these pieces are scarce or they are not for free, and some
>> groups of robots want your own pieces for them, so finally the
>> robots�arrange�themselves in groups of collaborators that try to fabricate
>> pieces and protect them from the attacks of�other�groups. Things become more
>> complicated, since, for better defense and/or fabrication and/or attack the
>> groups become bigger, and some subgroups are formed iinside, in order to
>> have privileged access to valuable pieces in detriment of the other members
>> of the big group.
>>
>> At a point in the programing, you have to deal with comunication of each
>> robot with the fellow robots. As a result of this comunication, you must
>> evaluate if what is communicated to you is true of false. If true it is
>> hold in the list of true statements. �If not, it is rejected. �The true
>> statements will be used for the�elaboration�of social behaviours intended to
>> obtain pieces and to maintain the group of collaborators, the fabrication,
>> ownership, and maybe robbery of new pieces for the future. Or else, the
>> group will die, the robot will die and its lists of truths too.
>>
>> Since you know that finally the social robots will end
>> in�arrangements�of�collaborators�in the way I described above, T�How would 
>> you
>> design the evaluator iof true and false statements.?
>>
>> --
>> Alberto.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alberto.
>



-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to