On 27 Jan 2013, at 14:06, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
IMHO meditation is a perfectly natural phenomenon
that does not need to be "integrated" into anything.
?
Then, why do you integrate it in the natural phenomenon?
Bruno
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-27, 07:09:43
Subject: Re: meditation
On 25 Jan 2013, at 16:41, Roger Clough wrote:
I think that meditation is a way of cutting out the
links of consciousness to the noise of the brain,
suggesting that Cs is not a product of the brain,
rather the reverse. It lets us experience Cs
as it really is, cosmic, free of the brain.
OK. Note that there are other methods with less bad secondary effect
than meditation or wine.
Those experiences are not concluding, in the public sense, but are
part of the research and they *can* be integrated in different
scientific (thus hypothetical) theories. Rigor consists simply in
keeping the interrogation marks.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
