I agree with you Russell. It's nice to have new thinkers contributing ideas as I was getting bored with Weinberg vs Clark, but at a certain point this group will lose interest for me completely if 90% of the threads are about stuff unrelated to the original 'everything' list concept. It's not the anything list!
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:53:38 AM UTC+11, Russell Standish wrote: > > Might I remind everybody that the purpose of the everything-list is to > discuss ensemble theories of everything. If you want to know what that > is, please consult Wei Dei's description > http://www.weidai.com/everything.html > > Granted, this does touch on a lot of topics, ranging over fundamental > science, philosophy and even aspects of religion, but is not relevant > to the current gun control debates, or a move to assert moral values > in our households (whose morals?), just two of the topics discussed > this morning on the list. > > The list is deliberately left free-ranging and unmoderated. That has > been its strength, and the list has been remarkably troll-free. But > can I please ask everybody to keep the discussion more or less on > topic, so that the list remains relevant. > > Cheers > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected]<javascript:> > University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
