After proving Euler's identity during a lecture, Benjamin Peirce, a noted American 19th-century philosopher, mathematician, and professor at Harvard University, stated that "it is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth." # Stanford University mathematics professor Keith Devlin said, "Like a Shakespearean sonnet that captures the very essence of love, or a painting that brings out the beauty of the human form that is far more than just skin deep, Euler's Equation reaches down into the very depths of existence."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_identity =====.. "it is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, . . . . .’ . . . but . . . ‘ Euler's Equation reaches down into the very depths of existence." ===.. On Feb 12, 7:35 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > How to understand Vacuum: T=0K ? > ==. > Physics (classical + quantum) lives under shadow of Vacuum. > I want throw light on this Vacuum. > Three theories explain the Vacuum T=0K : > a) theory of ideal gas because its temperature is T=0K, > > b) QED theory because this theory explain interaction > photon / electron not only with matter but with vacuum too, > > c) Euler’s equation: e^ i(pi) = - 1, because only in the > negative vacuum T=0K can exist ‘ virtual imaginaries particles’ > which Euler described by his formula: e^ i(pi) + 1= 0. > > d) The global conservation of energy is infinite . > And this infinite energy belong to the vacuum because that > more than 90% of mass ( dark mass/energy ) is hidden in the vacuum > How to understand vacuum's infinity ? > Vacuum's infinity has only one physical parameter: T=0K. > This physical parameter is the key to understand the essence of > Existence. > =. > Without Vacuum T=0K there isn’t Physics, > there isn’t Philosophy of Physics. > ====. > Best wishes. > Israel Sadovnik Socratus. > ==============. > > On Feb 12, 7:15 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > ' global conservation of energy can't even be defined for > > the universe ' > > Brent > > > It means that global conservation of energy is infinite . > > And this infinite energy belong to the vacuum because that > > more than 90% of mass ( dark mass/energy ) is hidden in the vacuum > > How to understand vacuum's infinity ? > > Vacuum's infinity has only one physical parameter: T=0K. > > = > > > On Feb 11, 7:48 pm, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2/11/2013 2:51 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > I wrote that Planck gave answer to the questions: > > > > How to understand Alice's Quantumland ? > > > > How to describe the Universe as it really is ? > > > > > Does somebody disagree with Planck ? > > > > Well for one thing it appears that global conservation of energy can't > > > even be defined for > > > the universe (no timelike Killing field) - so it can hardly be the > > > foundation of physics. > > > > Brent > > > > > = > > > > > On Feb 10, 7:46 am, "[email protected]"<[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > >> How to describe the Universe as it really is ? > > > >> =. > > > >> In his " Scientific Autobiography" Max Planck wrote : > > > >> ' The outside world is something independent from man, > > > >> something absolute, and the quest for the laws which apply > > > >> to this absolute appeared to me as the most sublime scientific > > > >> pursuit in life. ' > > > > >> What are these ' laws which apply to this absolute ' world ? > > > >> ==.. > > > >> In the beginning Planck wrote, that " From young years.... > > > >> the search of the laws, concerning to something absolute, > > > >> seemed to me the most wonderful task in scientist s life." > > > >> And after some pages Planck wrote again, that > > > >> " the search for something absolute seemed to me the > > > >> most wonderful task for a researcher." > > > >> And after some pages Planck wrote again, that > > > >> the most wonderful scientific task for me was > > > >> searching of something absolute." > > > >> ==.. > > > >> And as for the relation between relativity and absolute > > > >> Planck wrote, that the fact of " relativity assumes the > > > >> existence of something absolute" ; > > > >> "the relativity has sense when something absolute resists it. > > > >> Planck wrote that the phrase " all is relative " misleads us, > > > >> because there is something absolute . > > > >> And the most attractive thing was for Planck > > > >> to find something absolute that was hidden in its foundation. > > > >> 3. > > > >> And Planck explained what there is absolute in the physics: > > > >> a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy,. > > > >> b) The negative 4D continuum, > > > >> c) The speed of light quanta, > > > >> d) The maximum entropy which is possible > > > >> at temperature of absolute zero: T=0K. > > > >> ==. > > > >> I think that these four Planck's points are foundation of science. > > > >> =. > > > >> socratus- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
