On 20 Apr 2013, at 05:26, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/19/2013 5:31 PM, John Clark wrote:
The reason nobody has a answer to the hard problem is that nobody
has clearly explained exactly what the problem is or what the
answer is expected to do.
I'm not so sure of the problem, but I'm pretty sure of the
solution. When we can build AI robots that exhibit (including
reporting) intelligent and emotional responses similar to humans and
we can map between their AI and the function of brains in a way that
allows us to reliably adjust the behavior of AI robots and/or humans
- then we will have "solved" the problem, in the practical sense
that no one will care about it in general terms but will discuss it
in technical terms the way biologists discuss protein production and
messenger RNA and DNA error correction but no longer discuss "what
is life?".
No this will not work. We must test the physical consequence of the
belief that the brain can be truncated at a finite level. If not, it
is just pseudo aristotelian religion.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
