On 12 Jun 2013, at 22:38, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/12/2013 1:34 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Physicalism is by itself a strong assumption, incompatible with a
simple and elegant theory of mind (computer science/arithmetic).
You say that from time to time, but when pressed it seems to just be
that assuming fundamental matter is, assuming comp, otiose - not
incompatible.
They are epistemologically incompatible, or if you prefer,
incompatible with the use of Occam razor, which I assume in the search
of the TOE. (I have explained this already, so to be short, I just
"say incompatible").
If it were incompatible, then derivative matter would be
incompatible too.
Of course.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
