What "exist" means?
2013/6/13 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> > > On 12 Jun 2013, at 22:38, meekerdb wrote: > > On 6/12/2013 1:34 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Physicalism is by itself a strong assumption, incompatible with a simple > and elegant theory of mind (computer science/arithmetic). > > > You say that from time to time, but when pressed it seems to just be that > assuming fundamental matter is, assuming comp, otiose - not incompatible. > > > They are epistemologically incompatible, or if you prefer, incompatible > with the use of Occam razor, which I assume in the search of the TOE. (I > have explained this already, so to be short, I just "say incompatible"). > > If it were incompatible, then derivative matter would be incompatible too. > > > Of course. > > Bruno > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- Alberto. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
