On Thursday, September 5, 2013, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > > My position would suggest that the more mechanistic the conditions of the > test, the more it stacks the test in favor of not being able to tell the > difference. If you want to fool someone into thinking an AI is alive, get a > small group of people who lean toward aspberger's traits and show them > short, unrelated examples in a highly controlled context. >
You accept, of course, that people with Aspbergers have fe > If you want to really bring out the differences between the two, use a > diverse audience and have them interact freely for a long time in many > different contexts, often without oversight. What you are looking for is > aesthetic cues that may not even be able to be named - intuitions of > something about the AI being off or untrustworthy, continuity gaps, > non-fluidity, etc. It's sort of like taking a video screen out into the > sunlight. You get a better view of what it isn't when you can see more of > what it is. > > -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
