<http://24.media.tumblr.com/81bb846756fd19a9561c4bceae885d3e/tumblr_mw2xreqAQl1qeenqko1_500.jpg> Another diagram, maybe better?
On Sunday, November 10, 2013 8:42:34 PM UTC-5, Jason wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Craig Weinberg > <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Thanks for uploading it, great job! >> >> Here's what I propose to re-interpret QM: >> >> <http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/instant_eternal.jpg> >> >> Beams exist only within the experience of the various participants, not >> as literal beams across a vacuum. There are no literal waves or particles. >> What is happening is that the stimulated physical components are arranged >> to reflect their stimulation to each other, which occurs in a physical >> frame of time that is essentially timeless. >> > > I believe in a four-dimensional existence (timeless physics). > > >> The physical layer, I am saying is the most primitive layer of >> experience, within which space and time divergence is generated. Light does >> not happen in spacetime, spacetime happens in experience (which is light, >> or any other sensation). >> > > Is this like describing a type of idealism then? ( > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_idealism ) > > >> On the right hand side, the topological layers of sensitivity slow down >> the instant and recapitulate larger and larger chunks of eternity into each >> frame of awareness. >> > > How does some particle carry all that information of its entire history? > Aren't particles of the same kind practically (if not theoretically) > indistinguishable? Perhaps in QM the multiple values a particle's property > can take on represent an ever growing collection of information that can be > associated with that particle? > > >> I tried to show how the footprint of the inanimate objects extends all >> the way down to the bottom, but remains indifferent to the spatiotemporal >> strata on the right hand side. Not the best diagram, I admit, but maybe >> gives some sense of the model I suggest. >> > > It took me a few times re-reading what you wrote but I think I can > interpret some of what you are saying. > > Jason > > >> >> >> On Sunday, November 10, 2013 4:49:00 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> I've put together a primer on QM, as I think in the process of >>> explaining something in simple terms can help improve one's understanding >>> of a given subject. I thought I would share it with this list in case it >>> might help anyone else. I also welcome any feedback anyone has to offer >>> regarding it. >>> >>> Jason >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
