On 11/11/2013 5:04 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Every science whose conclusions have effects in politics has a high risk of being
manipulated. In the URSS and here. From Anthropology to long term Meteorology to
everything in the middle. The one that does not realize that is poor fool who does not
know how the world works and has replaced with all his innocent stupidity the fairy
tales of the past with the fairy tales of supposed sciences.
If you read the mails of the East Anglia Climategate scandal, One of the main concern of
the Warmists were about to keep in control over the peer reviewing mechanism of the main
scientific magazines Long interchanges of mails were devoted to talk about stablishing
barriers in the peer reviewed magazines by perverting the PR mechanisms.
Because they had already seen the process being manipulated by the well funded Deniers and
their political allies.
The fact is that peer reviewing is not a guaranty, on the contraty. It acts as an
ideological filter rather than as a quality filter in every discipline in which
politics and scientists benefit from mutual cooperation by interchanging money for
Yes, some scientists might be biased - so we should assumed you deniers have the truth on
the basis of no evidence except that in the past some scientists have been biased.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.