On 8 December 2013 20:58, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/7/2013 9:34 PM, Jason Resch wrote: > > Everett's idea explains the appearance of collapse without supposing it, > so it is more rightfully called a theory. It is also the only theory under > which QM is compatible with the well-established principles of locality, > causality, and determinism. If you believe in QM, and any of those > principles, Everett is your only option. > > > Determinism is far from "well established". > > Surely Everett's interpretation makes quantum mechanics deterministic. So rather than being compatible with it, it *makes* it "well established", well, as far as anything does...
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
