On 8 December 2013 20:58, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 12/7/2013 9:34 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
> Everett's idea explains the appearance of collapse without supposing it,
> so it is more rightfully called a theory. It is also the only theory under
> which QM is compatible with the well-established principles of locality,
> causality, and determinism. If you believe in QM, and any of those
> principles, Everett is your only option.
> Determinism is far from "well established".
> Surely Everett's interpretation makes quantum mechanics deterministic. So
rather than being compatible with it, it *makes* it "well established",
well, as far as anything does...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.