|
Amen on most points, Edgar. I also have
misgivings about the existence of the multiverse for different
reasons that this posting is not the place to vent. But, for we humans, the present moment exists for each of us. Your "common present moment" is an assumption that all x, y, and z of this 3-D realm experience simultaneity, even though every local set of coordinates, for instance, x1, y1, z1, if they have a self-aware structure (SAS), i.e. an observer, will have different experiences - albeit, even if only that the coordinates are different. You are trying to make your "common present moment" an axiom of reality that, for all x, y, and z, there is only one t. Though it makes common sense for a strictly Newtonian universe, when one adds relativistic considerations of the connectivity of space and time into a space-time continuum, your axiom of a common present may not hold. I am, BTW, a physicist by education. I don't post much. Howard Marks Certainly, your assumption can be made and explored. On 12/25/2013 10:52 AM, Edgar L. Owen
wrote:
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. |
- The 'Super Anthropic Principle' - why multiverses are not ne... Edgar L. Owen
- Re: The 'Super Anthropic Principle' - why multiverses a... spudboy100
- Re: The 'Super Anthropic Principle' - why multiverses a... Howard Marks
- Re: The 'Super Anthropic Principle' - why multiverses a... Edgar L. Owen
- Re: The 'Super Anthropic Principle' - why multiverses a... Jason Resch
- Re: The 'Super Anthropic Principle' - why multiverses a... Edgar L. Owen

