Bruno, The computations are NOT PHYSICAL. How many times do I have to tell you that before you get it?
Edgar On Friday, January 24, 2014 3:28:00 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 23 Jan 2014, at 20:57, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > Finally I agree there is NOT just a single computation going on. I just > agreed with that in my previous response. I suggested there are myriads of > computations going on in a single computational reality. One of course > needs a single computational reality for all the computational results to > manifest in the same universe. > > > OK. But it does not need to be physical. In fact nobody can define > "physical computation" without using the arithmetical notion. Arithmetic > provides a simple realm containing all computations. The physical > appearance can be (and must be, by UDA) explained from it. > > 1. There is a single fundamental computational reality which includes > myriads of individual computations? > > > Yes, indeed. A tiny part of arithmetic (sigma_1 arithmetic) contains *all* > possible computations. It is a consequence of Church thesis, or of Turing > definition of computations. > > > > 2. This fundamental computational reality includes the attribute of > becoming? > > > In the first person view that we can attribute to relativ > ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
