Bruno, The computations are NOT PHYSICAL. How many times do I have to tell you that before you get it?
Edgar On Friday, January 24, 2014 3:28:00 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 23 Jan 2014, at 20:57, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > Finally I agree there is NOT just a single computation going on. I just > agreed with that in my previous response. I suggested there are myriads of > computations going on in a single computational reality. One of course > needs a single computational reality for all the computational results to > manifest in the same universe. > > > OK. But it does not need to be physical. In fact nobody can define > "physical computation" without using the arithmetical notion. Arithmetic > provides a simple realm containing all computations. The physical > appearance can be (and must be, by UDA) explained from it. > > 1. There is a single fundamental computational reality which includes > myriads of individual computations? > > > Yes, indeed. A tiny part of arithmetic (sigma_1 arithmetic) contains *all* > possible computations. It is a consequence of Church thesis, or of Turing > definition of computations. > > > > 2. This fundamental computational reality includes the attribute of > becoming? > > > In the first person view that we can attribute to relativ > ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
