2014/1/24 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> > Quentin, > > Boy, this is like talking to a cult member. Only true believer personal > flame attacks supporting their 'guru' with no actual substance at all. And > you think it's me that shouldn't be posting on a scientific forum? > > Go figure! >
Yeah go figure... > :-) > I'm not laughing, I find it very annoying to have someone like you polluting a forum like this... when someone show you're wrong, you simply ignore it, act like you know the truth and repeat lies ad nauseam... please, go away. Quentin > > Edgar > > > > > On Friday, January 24, 2014 11:56:28 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> >> 2014/1/24 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> >> >> Bruno, >> >> Stop making the ridiculous claim that "there is only one computational >> reality, the UD", as if yours was the only one that could even be >> postulated. >> >> My computational reality is NOT the same as your 'comp', and your >> conclusions obviously do not apply to mine. >> >> I've explained mine in detail in a number of posts. >> >> And I don't answer the question "can we survive with an artificial brain >> in my theory" because it is irrelevant sci fi fantasy with all sorts of >> unstated assumptions. My theory deals with reality, not with sci fi. >> >> >> Have you other jokes like that in your pocket ? >> >> I wonder when you'll stop posting, I hope it won't take as long as it >> took for roger... >> >> >> However I've already stated the strict answer to the question as stated >> and with the normal theoretical (and totally impracticable) assumptions is >> 'yes, of course', but so what? It has nothing to do with the core >> principles of computational reality... Why do you keep asking this question >> I've already answered? >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> On Friday, January 24, 2014 11:01:52 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Jan 2014, at 14:44, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> >> Bruno, >> >> The computations are NOT PHYSICAL. How many times do I have to tell you >> that before you get it? >> >> >> I did not say that. >> But you mentioned a single computational reality. What do you mean? >> >> There is only one single computational reality, the UD*, or any sigma_1 >> complete reality, and this needs arithmetic (or >> >> ... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
