On 09 Feb 2014, at 19:56, John Clark wrote:


On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>> The invention of language was obviously of great benefit to the species called Homo sapiens, but like all tools it is not perfect and sometimes the brain can waste a great deal of processing power spinning its wheels over questions of words rather than ideas. For example, a recent poll showed that 70% of people in the USA thought that if a dying patient agreed then doctors should be allowed to "end the patient's life by some painless means"; however only 51% thought that doctors should be allowed to help a dying patient who wanted to die "commit suicide". Another example would be those who DON'T believe in a omnipotent omniscient intelligent conscious being who created the universe and is responsible for morality but DO believe in "God".

> What about those who believe, or assume, a god, or a goddess, but disbelieve omnipotence, and are agnostic on omniscience?

I suppose a supreme being need not be omnipotent, he or she just needs to be better than the competition, but there is one thing you can't get around, a supreme being needs to be A BEING; an Amorphous Vague Fog Of Bafflegab (AVFOB) is not enough.

Neoplatonist theologian are very careful about this. God might be a sort of person, but for them he is responsible for all the being, and is not part of the being. In Plotinus, both God and Matter do "not exist" in some sense, as what exists is what God does, and Matter is where God lose control.

Then I let you debate with yourself on the two questions:
1) is arithmetical truth a being?
2) can arithmetical truth appears as some being from the points of view of universal machines?






>I have never use the term God in the papers, but have use Plotinus ONE, or Plato's truth, or the term "theology".

One is the first integer

Not really. "One" is a nickname chosen by Plotinus for the Platonist- Parmenidian abstract conception of God. Plato opposes somehow two conceptions of God. The God of the Timaeus is more Aristotelian, and looks like some architect or artist, and somehow, Neoplatonism will recover it in the Soul, the inner God. Plotinus' One comes from the God of the Parmenides, which nature is very different. It is an hellenist tradition to have three Gods, and this is reflected in the Christian trinity. For the neoplatonist, there is only one "ONE" (God), but it emanates or degenerates and gives the MANY in the form of the Noùs, the realm of the intelligible ideas, and this emanates too and give birth to the soul, which will somehow be responsible for matter and nature. Of course, the first integer (for the greek), the number 1 is very important, and related to the ONE. Yet today we know the number one is the *second* integer, enclosed between 0 and 2. Important numbers, if this is not trivial.




and it is not a being, and neither is the state of being true, therefore neither is the supreme being.

> In this forum I have used God in some reply, and this has help to confirm my feeling that only atheists are annoyed by this,

You don't need to be a atheist, anybody who thinks that words should mean something would be annoyed.

No, people who thinks that word should mean something have no problem, as the term God is the term used in comparative theology with a large but rather clear meaning. Only those insisting that God means the Christian God appears to be annoyed.




> atheists, constantly, defend the christian's concept of God, more than the Christians.

Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never heard that one before, at least I never heard it before I was 12.

Religion without science is mad.
Science without religion is blind.

To separate science from religion leads to schizophrenia.

You confuse religion with the sick remnant of years of use of violence in the pseudo-argumentation.

Despite your intention, your attitude is helping them. By mocking the field, you leave it in the hand of the pseudo-authorities.

Bruno



 John K Clark





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to