On 12 February 2014 00:41, Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:45 AM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 11 February 2014 18:40, Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> String theory based on Maldacena's conjecture predicted the viscosity of >>> the quark-gluon plasma before it was measured >>> >> >> Correctly, I assume. >> >> >>> and more recently explained the mechanism behind EPR based on >>> Einstein-Rosen bridges, which is more like a retrodiction. >>> >>>> >> That seems like a sledgehammer to crack a nut, although the initials have >> a nice near-symmetry. Why would one need to have ERBs - that presumably >> have to be kept open by some exotic mechanicsm - to explain EPR when you >> can do it very simply anyway? >> > > And how can it be done very simply? > > By dropping Bell's assumption that time is fundamentally asymmetric (for the particles used in an EPR experiment, which are generally photons). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
