On 11 February 2014 18:40, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> String theory based on Maldacena's conjecture predicted the viscosity of
> the quark-gluon plasma before it was measured
>

Correctly, I assume.


> and more recently explained the mechanism behind EPR based on
> Einstein-Rosen bridges, which is more like a retrodiction.
>
>>
That seems like a sledgehammer to crack a nut, although the initials have a
nice near-symmetry. Why would one need to have ERBs - that presumably have
to be kept open by some exotic mechanicsm - to explain EPR when you can do
it very simply anyway?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to