On 2/11/2014 7:45 PM, LizR wrote:
On 12 February 2014 16:33, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:29 PM, LizR <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 12 February 2014 16:23, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Bell's Inequality in my opinion does not explain the mechanism of
EPR. The
Einstein-Rosen bridge does. It explains how entangled particles
maintain
their connection.
I don't understand what you mean. Bell's inequality isn't an
explanation, it's a
number which is violated in the measured results of EPR experiments.
You seem to have forgotten my original claim for string theory, that using
Maldacena's duality it explains the mechanism of EPR. *Bell's Inequality
does not
explain the mechanism. *Seems you trust math more than physics or even data
as in
the other thread.
Shorn of the ad hominem nonsense, that's what I just said.
What you said was:
String theory based on Maldacena's conjecture predicted the viscosity of the
quark-gluon plasma before it was measured and more recently explained the
mechanism
behind EPR based on Einstein-Rosen bridges, which is more like a
retrodiction.
An EBR bridge, which is a classical GR concept is not an adequate explanation of EPR Bell
violation until you can explain how an EBR is formed and maintained and how that produces
the extra correlation. Otherwise it's just hand-waving "there's a connection".
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
