On 2/12/2014 3:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Feb 2014, at 02:22, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/11/2014 10:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
What Everett did for the quantum universal wave, we can do that on any universal
system, and comp predicts that this will always give the same physics.
How does it predict that?
All universal systems produce the same collection of all computations, with exactly the
same redundancy.
Physics emerged from that set of all computations. So physics must be the same whatever
pho_i are chosen for the ontological base.
That doesn't follow. If there are disjoint worlds, as contemplated in some versions of
cosmology, they may have different physics. You seem to be making your claim a tautology
by saying whatever your theory produces is physics, even if it's not any physics we know
of. That makes it impossible to test.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
