On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Bell's Inequality in my opinion does not explain the mechanism of EPR. > True, Bell couldn't explain it but he did prove that if his inequality is violated then there is something that needs to be explained. Bell said that if the universe worked in a way that nearly everybody thought was intuitively obvious then a inequality that he found could never be violated, but quantum mechanics said that it could be. Years later experiments were performed to see who was right and it turned out that quantum mechanics triumphed over common sense. Today very few physicists even claim to have a deep understanding of why that is true, but the experimental evidence is now so strong that none can deny that it is in fact true. > The Einstein-Rosen bridge does. > No it does not. In fact, although Einstein never lived to see Bell's work, if he had he would have certainly bet that experiments would never find that Bell's inequality was ever violated. And Einstein would have lost his bet. > It explains how entangled particles maintain their connection. > Einstein-Rosen bridges may or may not exist, but even if they do neither Einstein nor Rosen could explain how their bridge "knows" if a observer (whatever that means) is looking at it or not. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
